FILE ON CANADIAN INCUMBENTSCompany
Canadian incumbents
the CRTC simultaneously expanded foreign streamer obligations and reduced Canadian incumbent obligations1. Foreign streamers themselves are ineligible for the principal pools they fund2.
DEVELOPING FILE
This file has 4 sources on record so far more may surface as the record grows.
On the record see profile →
the CRTC simultaneously expanded foreign streamer obligations and reduced Canadian incumbent obligations
The CRTC Streaming Contribution Regime as Incumbent Protecti
“the CRTC simultaneously expanded foreign streamer obligations and **reduced** Canadian incumbent obligations”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Foreign streamers themselves are ineligible for the principal pools they fund
The CRTC Streaming Contribution Regime as Incumbent Protecti
“**Foreign streamers themselves are ineligible** for the principal pools they fund”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
CMF Broadcaster Envelope is ~$155M out of $201M
The CRTC Streaming Contribution Regime as Incumbent Protecti
“~$155M out of $201M flows to broadcasters they control”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Canadian incumbents that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"the system is a subsidy from foreign streamers to Canadian incumbents"
Asserted by MPA · stance: pro
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
The CRTC Streaming Contribution Regime as Incumbent Protecti ↗