FILE ON CANADIAN POLLING INDUSTRYCompany

Canadian polling industry

the Canadian polling industry has no independent regulator equivalent to AAPOR1. the Canadian polling industry has weaker disclosure rules than the UK's BPC2.

3 SOURCES · 5 DOCUMENTED FACTS · 2 DISPUTED · OPENED 2026-07-22 · UPDATED 2026-07-22 · SIGNED ANALYSIS ON FILE
On the record see profile →

the Canadian polling industry has no independent regulator equivalent to AAPOR

PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T
“no independent regulator equivalent to AAPOR-with-teeth”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

the Canadian polling industry has weaker disclosure rules than the UK's BPC

PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T
“weaker disclosure rules than the UK's BPC”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

338Canada is a single dominant aggregator

PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T
“a single dominant aggregator (338Canada)”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

Canadian opt-in panels have few rural respondents

Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad
“Canadian opt-in panels have so few of these respondents that the weights become extreme”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

7.3 million advance-ballot voters in 2025

Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad
“7.3 million advance-ballot voters (a 25% increase over 2021)”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →

These are things people say about Canadian polling industry that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.

Disputed
"The Canadian polling industry has not seriously addressed turnout model failure"
Unattributed assertion · stance: critical
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad ↗
Disputed
"the Canadian polling industry has been hollowed out into a federally subsidized, methodologically opaque, AI-experimentation playground"
Unattributed assertion · stance: critical
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T ↗