FILE ON CHAMBER OF PROGRESSCompany

Chamber of Progress

Tourist resort towns in B.C. have been explicitly exempted from B.C.'s 2024 principal-residence law1.

1 SOURCE · 1 DOCUMENTED FACT · 1 DISPUTED · OPENED 2026-07-23 · UPDATED 2026-07-23
DEVELOPING FILE

This file has 1 source on record so far more may surface as the record grows.

On the record see profile →

Tourist resort towns in B.C. have been explicitly exempted from B.C.'s 2024 principal-residence law

Did Banning Airbnb Actually Fix Canadian Housing? An Evidenc
“**Tourist resort towns in B.C.** (Whistler 35% PLTD, Tofino, Sun Peaks): these towns have been **explicitly exempted** from B.C.'s 2024 principal-residence law”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →

These are things people say about Chamber of Progress that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.

Disputed
"STR bans are a regressive transfer to the hotel industry that does not solve housing"
Asserted by Tyler Cowen · stance: critical
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
Did Banning Airbnb Actually Fix Canadian Housing? An Evidenc ↗
Undated
null
NYC implemented Local Law 18
People