FILE ON DOCUMENTARYEntity

Documentary

A documentary close typically does one of three things: (a) names what the investigation has changed about how we should see the topic, (b) names what is still unresolved and why that matters, or (c) reveals the larger meaning the narrow question turned out to be about.1. The synthesis/close is consequential, not concluding.2.

2 SOURCES · 10 DOCUMENTED FACTS · 6 DISPUTED · OPENED 2026-07-24 · UPDATED 2026-07-24
On the record see profile →

A documentary close typically does one of three things: (a) names what the investigation has changed about how we should see the topic, (b) names what is still unresolved and why that matters, or (c) reveals the larger meaning the narrow question turned out to be about.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“A documentary close typically does one of three things: (a) names what the investigation has changed about how we should see the topic, (b) names what is still unresolved and why that matters, or (c) reveals the larger meaning the narrow question turned out to be about.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

The synthesis/close is consequential, not concluding.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“The synthesis/close is consequential, not concluding.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

Documentary-investigative register prefers past-tense factual narration

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“The tense is part of the credibility apparatus.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

There are three valid close-forms for a documentary.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“Three valid close-forms, in order of preference for the operator's forensic use case:”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

The attribution test, tense test, and 'what was actually going on' test can determine if prose is documentary register.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“Three diagnostics:”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

A documentary uses interviews two ways.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“A documentary uses interviews two ways.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

The system should encode this distinction: interview-as-evidence material should be deployed during the body/anatomy section to advance the case; interview-as-commentary material is appropriate during the frame, the competing-accounts section, and the synthesis.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“The system should encode this distinction: interview-as-evidence material should be deployed during the body/anatomy section to advance the case; interview-as-commentary material is appropriate during the frame, the competing-accounts section, and the synthesis.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

The system should support two positions and let the operator pick:

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“The system should support two positions and let the operator pick:”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

The documentary register has a small set of recurring attribution moves.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“The documentary register has a small set of recurring attribution moves”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source

In voice, attribution have to be sentence-shaped.

The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
“In voice, they have to be sentence-shaped.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →

These are things people say about Documentary that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.

Disputed
"past tense carries the implicit claim of having-been-investigated"
Asserted by Documentary narrator · stance: pro
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For ↗
Disputed
"The system should encode a small register of uncertainty-marking phrases"
Unattributed assertion · stance: pro
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For ↗
Disputed
"A documentary closes by naming what now changes, in light of what was found."
Unattributed assertion · stance: pro
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For ↗
Disputed
"attribution comes before the claim, not after"
Unattributed assertion · stance: pro
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For ↗
Disputed
"The reframing close, consequence close, and unresolved close are valid close-forms."
Unattributed assertion · stance: pro
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For ↗
Disputed
"Authority comes from sourcing, attribution, evidence in documentaries."
Unattributed assertion · stance: pro
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For ↗
Undated
handling investigative through-line
closing a documentary
People
Herzogmember of