FILE ON ELGIE & MCCLAYCompany
Elgie & McClay
5–17% emissions reduction (Elgie, Rivers) vs. no statistically significant aggregate effect (Pretis 2022).
DEVELOPING FILE
This file has 1 source on record so far more may surface as the record grows.
On the record see profile →
5–17% emissions reduction (Elgie, Rivers) vs. no statistically significant aggregate effect (Pretis 2022)
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Elgie & McClay that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"BC carbon tax had a 17% decline in covered fuel use"
Asserted by Elgie & McClay · stance: pro
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
The Net-Zero / Carbon-Credit / Climate-Finance Architecture: ↗