Kevin Perjurer
Frontline pieces typically open with a precise question or development, lay out the actors involved, walk through evidence chronologically or thematically, present competing accounts, and close with consequences.1. Perjurer's narration is utterly deadpan at all times2.
Frontline pieces typically open with a precise question or development, lay out the actors involved, walk through evidence chronologically or thematically, present competing accounts, and close with consequences.
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
Perjurer's narration is utterly deadpan at all times
The Documentary Voice: A Specification for Investigative/For
Perjurer's videos share a structure: open with the artifact/system, trace its origin, walk through the decision points, document the consequences, close on what it reveals about the institution
These are things people say about Kevin Perjurer that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
"Perjurer's investigation surfaces the meta-question of who gets credit for commercial work."
"Defunctland's Disney Channel's Theme works because Perjurer is honest about the process."