FILE ON LAINE/CLAYPOOL/SMITHPerson
Laine/Claypool/Smith
DEVELOPING FILE
This file has 1 source on record so far more may surface as the record grows.
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Laine/Claypool/Smith that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"the cited like-to-view ratios are insufficient evidence to establish suppression on their own"
Unattributed assertion · stance: pro
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
Canadian Independent Political YouTube and the "Algorithmic ↗