On the record see profile →
Bill C-11 updated CanCon rules for streamers
Research Brief: Negative Partisanship and the "Silence Patte
“C-11 was sold as updating CanCon rules for streamers”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Bill C-22 / Lawful Access Act was introduced in Canada in 2026
Research Brief: Negative Partisanship and the "Silence Patte
“Bill C-22 / Lawful Access Act (Canada, 2026) — the anchor case”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Bill C-11 (Online Streaming Act) and Bill C-18 (Online News Act) were introduced
Research Brief: Negative Partisanship and the "Silence Patte
“Example 3: Bill C-11 (Online Streaming Act) and Bill C-18 (Online News Act) — Liberal defenders fell quiet after rollout”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Liberal government that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"the Liberal government is surely ecstatic about the relatively muted response"
Asserted by Centre for International Governance Innovation · stance: critical
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
Research Brief: Negative Partisanship and the "Silence Patte ↗
Disputed
"the bill was poorly drafted"
Asserted by Senator Paula Simons · stance: critical
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
Research Brief: Negative Partisanship and the "Silence Patte ↗
Timeline see standalone →
Undated
—
Bill C-11 passage