On the record see profile →
Pembina estimated Phase 2 emissions at 6.8 MtCO₂e/year
The Net-Zero / Carbon-Credit / Climate-Finance Architecture:
“Pembina estimated Phase 2 emissions at 6.8 MtCO₂e/year”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
LNG Canada Phase 2 emissions will be 35% lower than the world's best-performing LNG facilities and 60% lower than the global average
The Net-Zero / Carbon-Credit / Climate-Finance Architecture:
“LNG Canada Phase 2 emissions will be "35% lower than the world's best-performing LNG facilities and 60% lower than the global average"”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
LNG Canada Phase 2 will be 35% lower than best-performing LNG globally
The Net-Zero / Carbon-Credit / Climate-Finance Architecture:
“PMO Sept 2025”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Phase 2 adds 6.8 MtCO₂e/year domestically plus downstream combustion emissions abroad
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about LNG Canada that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"LNG Canada Phase 2 is a lower carbon option"
Asserted by Prime Minister's Office · stance: pro
Evidence is genuinely split on this one — real support and real pushback both on record.
The Net-Zero / Carbon-Credit / Climate-Finance Architecture: ↗
Timeline see standalone →
Undated
—
LNG Canada Phase 2 announcement
—
Pembina estimates Phase 2 emissions
—
LNG Canada Phase 2 approval
People
Mark Carneycontrols