Mainstreet's IVR-and-mixed-mode methodology partially corrects
PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian Media-Pollster-Gover
The correlation between principal partisanship and poll accuracy is essentially zero.
PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian Media-Pollster-Gover
Mainstreet is the most accurate firm with 1.2 point total error in 2025.
PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian Media-Pollster-Gover
the major federal pollsters collect $14–19 million per year in Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) public-opinion research contracts
PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian Media-Pollster-Gover
IVR pollsters had the best 2025 performance
Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad
The distribution of last digits looks plausibly uniform
Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad
Mainstreet's methodology uses IVR with demographic and regional weighting
Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad
The 2017 Calgary failure was diagnosed by the Adams/Adams/Zussman MRIA panel report
Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad
Mainstreet's IVR-and-mixed-mode methodology, with random-digit-dial cell-and-landline contact, picks up these voters and is correspondingly more accurate
PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian Media-Pollster-Gover
Mainstreet Research has no documented partisan tilt.
PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian Media-Pollster-Gover
These are things people say about Mainstreet Research that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
"Mainstreet's 2025 result is partially unverifiable"
"The deliberate-rigging hypothesis is not supported by the fact that the most accurate firm is the least federally networked."
"political polling for these firms is marketing"
"Mainstreet's reforms are real"
"political polling for these firms is marketing"
"the incentive is to maximize visibility, which means publishing frequently and being part of the story — not necessarily to maximize accuracy"
"Anti-SLAPP protects the journalist; it does not protect against the pollster simply refusing to give interviews"
"the single most damaging fact for pollster independence is not who pays for the polls — it is who runs them"