The official story
How the corpus engages with Mark Carney's climate leadership
What is commonly said
Mark Carney is an effective leader in addressing climate change
Flagged because 1 separate source documents push back on this account.
What the documents show
“Carney has diagnosed McLuhan's problem and prescribed McLuhan's villain”
“Duff Conacher of Democracy Watch publicly stated the recommendations would, if enacted, force Carney to "sell his investments in Brookfield and other companies that cause serious, ongoing financial conflicts."”
Duff Conacher · Research Brief: A McLuhanesque Critique of Mark Carney
“worth millions of dollars”
Michael Cooper · Research Brief: A McLuhanesque Critique of Mark Carney
“print-age technocracy in pure form”
“The strongest essay is: **Carney is the most articulate possible exemplar of a particular cognitive mode — sequential, quantitative, institutional, target-driven, expert-credentialed Gutenberg cognition — and that mode has been structurally obsolesced by the very environment Carney is trying to govern.”
“He's a sincere climate advocate who lost the argument”
“Carney's framework failed to price energy security, exposed by the post-Strait-of-Hormuz crisis”
Michelle Rempel Garner · Research Brief: A McLuhanesque Critique of Mark Carney
“Mark Carney likes to talk green, but he's just another agent of the status quo”
openDemocracy · Research Brief: A McLuhanesque Critique of Mark Carney
This page is flagged automatically: when several separate documents contradict the same widely-held
account, it is surfaced here with the contradicting evidence attached. No signed analysis of this yet.