On the record see profile →
Reviewers noted the derivative nature of the central arguments in *Value(s)*
Introduction: The Pattern in Brief
“Reviewers across the political spectrum noted the derivative nature of the central arguments.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Carney's book cites Michael Sandel, Mariana Mazzucato, and Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa.
Mark Carney and the Question of Authorship: A Forensic Audit
“he cites Michael Sandel directly on commodification, he cites Mariana Mazzucato (whose book *The Value of Everything* shares an obvious title affinity), and he names Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Carney's central claim that markets must be 're-embedded' in social values is the Polanyi argument
No documented instance was found of Carney being publicly corrected by Sandel, Mazzucato or others he draws upon
Carney cites Michael Sandel directly on commodification.
Mark Carney and the Question of Authorship: A Forensic Audit
“he cites Michael Sandel directly on commodification”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Michael Sandel that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"*Value(s)* is a synthesis of arguments developed elsewhere by Sandel, Mazzucato, and Polanyi"
Asserted by Mark Carney · stance: pro
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
Introduction: The Pattern in Brief ↗
Disputed
"Carney's framework is a sanitised re-presentation of Sandel and Mazzucato without their political teeth"
Unattributed assertion · stance: critical
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
Forensic Research Memo: Mark Carney's Published and Unpublis ↗