Claims & sources
Léger
Claims & sources for Léger. Every fact below is a verbatim quote from a real document we have stored. ↩ See the full Record
| Claim | Asserted by | Stance | Evidence balance | Source | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| industry-wide honest but methodologically biased measurement | unattributed | neutral | +1.0 | Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the | ↗ |
| Léger is the *least* susceptible to federal POR contract capture among the top-tier firms | unattributed | pro | +1.0 | PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian | ↗ |
| the private-sector revenue dwarfs the federal revenue for the publicly-visible pollsters | unattributed | pro | +1.0 | PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian | ↗ |
| Léger VP of Transformation and AI Sarah Mottet claimed an 85–90% concordance score between Smart Persona output and traditional human panel results. | Sarah Mottet | pro | — | Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the | ↗ |
| Léger's 85–90% concordance claim is not an independently validated benchmark. | Pass 2 | critical | — | Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the | ↗ |
| Léger is structurally insulated from federal partisan capture | Jean-Marc Léger | pro | — | PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian | ↗ |
| Léger is the least susceptible to federal POR contract capture among the top-tier firms | unattributed | pro | — | PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian | ↗ |
| Léger's federal contracts (~$1.37M) are perhaps 1.5–2.5% of estimated revenue | unattributed | pro | — | PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian | ↗ |
| Firms are using synthetic respondents to fill gaps where coverage is failing. | unattributed | pro | — | PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian | ↗ |
| The synthetic respondent inflection point is the highest-leverage Pass 6 target. | unattributed | pro | — | PASS 5 — FOLLOW THE MONEY: The Canadian | ↗ |