DEVELOPING FILE
This file has 1 source on record so far more may surface as the record grows.
On the record see profile →
Bill C-22 is being debated
CANOPTICON DOSSIER — BILL C-22 (LAWFUL ACCESS ACT, 2026)
“luating in debate with respect to this bill is whether this is the right way to modernize the law … The question that I have, and that we have, is whether Bill C-22 is the appropriate mechanism to do so.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Anandasangaree that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"Anandasangaree distinguishes the two issues but is content for the political pressure to flow to C-22"
Asserted by Anandasangaree · stance: neutral
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
CANOPTICON DOSSIER — BILL C-22 (LAWFUL ACCESS ACT, 2026) ↗
Disputed
"Bill C-22 balances the needs of law enforcement with the privacy and civil rights that Canadians demand"
Asserted by Anandasangaree · stance: pro
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
CANOPTICON DOSSIER — BILL C-22 (LAWFUL ACCESS ACT, 2026) ↗
Timeline see standalone →
2026
2026-05
U.S. House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan and Foreign Affairs Chair Brian Mast send letter to Anandasangaree