FILE ON SIMON LAFORTUNEPerson

Simon Lafortune

Bill C-22 is being debated1.

2 SOURCES · 1 DOCUMENTED FACT · 1 DISPUTED · OPENED 2026-07-23 · UPDATED 2026-07-23
DEVELOPING FILE

This file has 2 sources on record so far more may surface as the record grows.

On the record see profile →

Bill C-22 is being debated

CANOPTICON DOSSIER — BILL C-22 (LAWFUL ACCESS ACT, 2026)
“luating in debate with respect to this bill is whether this is the right way to modernize the law … The question that I have, and that we have, is whether Bill C-22 is the appropriate mechanism to do so.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →

These are things people say about Simon Lafortune that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.

Disputed
"The bill is focused on updating existing tools to address modern threats while maintaining clear safeguards for privacy and civil liberties"
Asserted by Simon Lafortune · stance: pro
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
CANOPTICON DOSSIER — BILL C-22 (LAWFUL ACCESS ACT, 2026) ↗