FILE ON LAURA STEPHENSONPerson
Laura Stephenson
Pass 5 becomes a collaborative investigation if two or more priority-list researchers respond substantively1.
DEVELOPING FILE
This file has 4 sources on record so far more may surface as the record grows.
On the record see profile →
Pass 5 becomes a collaborative investigation if two or more priority-list researchers respond substantively
PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T
“If two or more of the priority-list researchers (Daoust, Bennett, Stephenson, Fournier, Kennedy) respond substantively, Pass 5 becomes a *collaborative* investigation rather than a solo forensic one.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Laura Stephenson that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"NPID independently predicts turnout, vote choice and political activity"
Asserted by McGregor · stance: pro
Not yet independently weighed — one source's claim, unconfirmed elsewhere.
Research Brief: Negative Partisanship and the "Silence Patte ↗