On the record see profile →
Pass 5 becomes a collaborative investigation if two or more priority-list researchers respond substantively
PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T
“If two or more of the priority-list researchers (Daoust, Bennett, Stephenson, Fournier, Kennedy) respond substantively, Pass 5 becomes a *collaborative* investigation rather than a solo forensic one.”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Philippe J. Fournier publishes pollster ratings page
PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T
“published pollster ratings page”
VERIFIED — a word-for-word match in the stored source
Fournier's public methodology page describes a mostly proportional swing model with regional adjustments
Disputed — who says what, against what see standalone →
These are things people say about Philippe J. Fournier that aren't settled fact — each one attributed to who's actually claiming it, so a claim never quietly passes as established just because it showed up in a document. Weigh it yourself.
Disputed
"Philippe J. Fournier's pollster ratings page can ruffle feathers"
Asserted by Philippe J. Fournier · stance: neutral
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
PASS 4 — The Researchers, The Natural Experiments, and the T ↗
Disputed
"the model is mechanically herd-following"
Asserted by Philippe J. Fournier · stance: critical
The evidence on file mostly supports this, but it's still someone's claim, not a settled fact.
Pass 2: The Forensics, the Math, and the Philosophy of Canad ↗
Timeline see standalone →
2026
2026-03
piece